D & H CO., INC. v. Shultz’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2015
8 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Brown · P.E.A.C.E. Corp. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. That [ Defendant ] concealed or failed to disclose a past or present fact which he had a duty to disclose; 2. That the fact was material; 3. That [ Defendant ] concealed or failed to disclose it with the intent of creating a false impression of the actual facts in the mind of [Plaintiff]; 4. That [ Defendant ] concealed or failed to disclose it with the intention that it should be acted upon by [ Plaintiff ]; 5. That [ Plaintiff ] acted in reliance upon it; and 6. That [ Plaintiff ] thereby suffered injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.