579 So. 2d 43 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Day v. State · 378 So. 2d 1173 - Turner v. State · 557 So. 2d 848 - Ward v. State · 531 So. 2d 35 - Maul v. State · 520 So. 2d 182 - Smoot v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appellant in stating the grounds for his motion did not include the issue now being raised regarding the chain of custody of the [cocaine]. Because the appellant failed to object concerning the chain of custody, he waived any review of that issue. Washington v. State , 555 So.2d 347 , 348 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989). 'Specific grounds of objection waive all grounds not specified.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edwards v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.