Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 So. 2d 609 - Morris v. Strickling

579 So. 2d 609 - Morris v. Strickling’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2011

4 state decisions

30199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cochran v. Keeton · 352 So. 2d 1143 - Scott v. Gill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The Morrises argue that the exception to the caveat emptor rule as stated in Cochran v. Keeton, 287 Ala. 439 , 252 So.2d 313 , 314 (1971) (holding that the rule caveat emptor would no longer be applicable to the sale of a newly constructed house, and recognizing an implied warranty of fitness and habitability with regard to such sales), should be extended to situations, such as the one at bar, involving the purchase of an unimproved piece of property. We disagree.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Furthermore, while Alabama courts recognize the implied warranty of fitness and habitability for the purpose purchased [sic] in newly constructed homes, we know of no such implied warranty extending to the purchase of lands. The physical condition of the premises has fallen under the rule of caveat emptor. See Cochran v. Keeton , 287 Ala. 439 , 252 So.2d 313 (1971); 77 Am.Jur.2d Vendor and Purchaser § 329.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.