Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 So. 2d 836 - State v. Hicks

579 So. 2d 836 - State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ross · California v. Carney · Maldonado v. State · 559 So. 2d 335 - State v. Starkey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent a search warrant, there are three valid means by which law enforcement may search a vehicle: (1) incident to a valid arrest of a recent occupant of the vehicle; (2) under the `automobile exception' to the warrant requirement, which requires exigent circumstances coupled with probable cause; and (3) when a vehicle has been impounded, as part of a reasonable inventory search following standardized procedure”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.