Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 So. 2d 900 - Watson v. State

579 So. 2d 900 - Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 567 So. 2d 425 - Wilson v. State · O'Steen v. State · 485 So. 2d 1296 - KMC v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In addition to any punishment, the court shall order the defendant to make restitution to the victim for damage or loss caused directly or indirectly by the defendant’s offense, unless it finds clear and compelling reasons not to order such restitution. Restitution may be monetary or nonmonetary restitution. The court shall make the payment of restitution a condition to probation....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We reverse the award of restitution to the victim's parents. This cause is affirmed in all other respects. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part. MINER, MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] In 1984, the Legislature amended section 775.089 by providing that restitution be made to the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in any provision of law relating to restitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.