Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 So. 2d 956 - State v. Knapper

579 So. 2d 956 - State v. Knapper’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 802 So. 2d 1224 - State v. Deruise (2001), 660 So. 2d 819 - State v. Marshall (1995)

44 state decisions

170199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · State v. Shropshire · 458 So. 2d 1284 - State v. Knapper · State ex rel. Scott v. First Circuit Court of Appeals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`reasonable probability' that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A `reasonable probability' is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f the omitted evidence creates a reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist, constitutional error has been committed. This means that the omission must be evaluated in the context of the entire record. If there is no reasonable doubt about guilt whether or not the additional evidence is considered, there is no justification for a new trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.