Wright v. Wolters’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rothermel v. Duncan · Lee v. Lee · Stolle v. Kanetzky · Matter of Estate of Woods · Hamill v. Brashear
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By the term ‘testamentary capacity’ is meant that the person making the will must, at the time the will is executed, have sufficient mental ability to understand the business in which he is engaged, the effect of his acts in making the will, the capacity to know the objects of his bounty and their claims upon him, and the general nature and extent of his property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wolters v. Wright
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.