Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 SW2D 370 - Schneider v. Putnam

Schneider v. Putnam’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Young v. Fulkerson · Holman Enterprise Tobacco Warehouse v. Carter · International Harvester Company v. Poff · Young v. Kentucky Baptist Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reason an apportionment case is different is that only in KRS 342.120, the apportionment statute, does the law expressly require that a pre-existing disability be excluded (in the form of a deduction) from the benefits otherwise payable as the result of a compensable injury or disease.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.