Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 SW2D 466 - Minix v. State

Minix v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 1992 · most notably McManus v. State (1979), Anderson v. State (1982)

25 state decisions

120197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Custom Leasing, Inc. v. Texas Bank & Trust Co. of Dallas · Wilson v. Jones · Paschall v. Anderson · Stuebgen v. State · Baker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . with intent to defraud and harm, forge the writing duplicated below by possessing it with intent to utter it and while knowing it was forged.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. McFarland v. State · Lee v. State
  2. ““ . . . TOM HENRY MATHIS hereinafter styled defendant, on or about the 16th day of October in the year of our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and 75 in the County and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully knowingly and intentionally with intent to defraud and harm, forge, by passing to Billy Jack Hubbard a writing which then and there purported to be but was not the act of E. M. Cox, said writing being of the tenor following: [instrument omitted], said defendant knowing the same to have been forged, . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Ex parte Mathis

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.