Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 579 S.W.2d 751 - Fallert Tool & Engineering Co. v. McClain

Fallert Tool & Engineering Co. v. McClain’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably Dunn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. (1981), 172 W. Va. 769 - Cline v. Joy Mfg. Co. (1983)

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

2201979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ackmann v. Keeney-Toelle Real Estate Company · Critcher v. Rudy Fick, Inc. · Millar v. Berg · Sumpter v. JE Sieben Construction Company · 235 Mo. App. 909 - Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general rule is that declarations of a party favorable to himself which are not part of the res gestae are hearsay, self-serving and inadmissible as evidence in his favor. A party cannot make evidence for himself by his own declarations. Such declarations are generally not rendered admissible by the fact that they were made in the presence of or in conversation or correspondence with, the other party or his agent unless the other party assents to the truth of the declarations. .. The reason for the rule is the inherent untrustworthiness of such declarations and the probability that their introduction in evidence would open the door to frauds, perjuries and manufactured evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.