¶1In a proceeding pursuant to section 415.00 of the Penal Law to declare the forfeiture of a motor vehicle, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 24, 1976, which, after a hearing, (1) denied petitioner’s application to declare a forfeiture of the vehicle and (2) directed the return of certain moneys to respondent. Order modified, on the facts, by deleting therefrom the provisions denying the application to declare a forfeiture of the vehicle. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner established by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence that the vehicle in question was used in the transportation of gambling records. Latham, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J. P., dissents and votes to affirm the order upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Wager at Special Term.
58 A.D.2d 602
Dillon v. Cuomo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 1977
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1977-06-13
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1992
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-06-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →