Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 A.D.3d 138 - Devore v. Pfizer Inc.

Devore v. Pfizer Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the locus jurisdiction's interests in protecting the reasonable expectations of the parties who relied on it to govern their primary conduct and in the admonitory effect that applying its law will have on similar conduct in the future assume critical importance and outweigh any interests of the common-domicile jurisdic tion.” Schultz, 65 N.Y.2d at 198 , 491 N.Y.S.2d at 96 , 480 N.E.2d at 684-85 . 5 . The degree to which Devore rests on this ground is unclear to us. In Devore, the First Department set forth accurately the Schultz rule that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the law of the jurisdiction where the tort occurred will generally apply because that jurisdiction has the greatest interest in regulating behavior within its borders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “locus of a tort is generally defined as the place of the injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.