Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 ARK 609 - State v. Washmood

State v. Washmood’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1961
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1961

6 state decisions

2018941900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Straub & Lohman v. Gordon · McGehee v. Mathis · City of Little Rock v. Barton · Baker v. State · City of Little Rock v. Board of Improvements

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was therefore an occupation tax, and, being a State tax also, the section authorizing it is in conflict with the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.