58 Cal. App. 100 - Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1952
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on MacDonald v. MacDonald · Avery v. Avery · Gale v. Bradbury · Lewis v. Lewis · 34 Cal. App. 658 - Dee v. Dee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The contention that the findings are so general upon the allegations of specific instances of cruelty alleged as to be insufficient to support the judgment is without merit. Had more specific findings been asked for or had, they would of necessity have been in plaintiff’s favor. Gale v. Bradbury, 116 Cal. 39, 40 , 47 Pac. 778 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.