58 Cal. App. 415 - Stone v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2003
6 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Brown · De la Montanya v. De la Montanya · Cohen v. Cohen · Lang v. Lang · Staacke v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... eleven months prior to the entry of the final decree. He had full opportunity to seek relief from the judgment under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. Williams“within one year after the rendition of any judgment in such action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.