Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 CALAPP2D 445 - Bixby v. Hotchkis

Bixby v. Hotchkis’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably 101 Cal. App. 2d 491 - Ford v. Palisades Corp. (1950), Bixby v. California Trust Co. (1949)

23 state decisions

801943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gray v. Union Trust Co. · 7 Cal. 2d 671 - Thomson v. Thomson · San Francisco Protestant Orphan Asylum Society v. Fitzsimmons · McColgan v. Magee, Inc. · Fish v. Benson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The former trustee's] right to indemnification out of the trust property for expenses actually incurred in defending the trust is expressly provided by section 2273 of the Civil Code [now Prob. Code, § 15684]. To the extent that she is entitled to indemnity she has a lien upon the trust property, a lien which the trial court properly accorded her in its judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.