People v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian · 11 Cal. 4th 274 - Trope v. Katz · 30 Cal. 3d 721 - Marina Point, Ltd. v. Wolfson · American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren · People v. Jackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The role of the judiciary is not to rewrite legislation to satisfy the court's, rather than the Legislature's, sense of balance and order. Judges are not `”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“knight[s]-errant, roaming at will in pursuit of [their] own ideal of beauty or of goodness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.