58 Ct. Cl.
Volume 58 — Court of Claims Reports
97 opinions
- 58 Ct. Cl. 1Stewart-McGehee Construction Co. v. United States (1922)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 9Poole Engineering & Machine Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 20Morrow v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 25Beaty v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 33Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 36Peninsular Stove Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 38Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 41Gulf & Ship Island Railroad v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 50Lanagan v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 53Garford Motor Truck Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 58Blake v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 61Bartlett & Kling v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Ref or taps statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. On August 13,1910, the plaintiff entered into a contract in writing with the United States whereby the plaintiff agreed to furnish all the labor and material for the construction of a concrete dam, spillway, and valve chamber at Fort Meade, S. Dak., in accordance with plans and specifications attached to, and forming a part of said contract; and the United States agreed…
- 58 Ct. Cl. 63Williamson Heater Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 73Rhoades v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 75Parker v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 76Venezuelan Meat Export Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 81J. J. Preis & Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. On June 12,1917, a contract in writing was entered into between the plaintiff, J. J. Preis & Co., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of New York, and the United States, represented by Col. M. Gray Zalinski, Quartermaster Corps, United States Army, which contract was designated as contract No. 1324, and by the terms of which the plaintiff undertook to…
- 58 Ct. Cl. 87Schaff v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, Charles E. Schaff, is the receiver duly appointed, qualified, and acting of the property of the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Kailway Co. of Texas, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas, and now operates the system of railways formerly and for a long time operated by the said corporation in the State of Texas.
- 58 Ct. Cl. 93Rigsbee v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case ae found by the court: I. In the latter part of October, 1918, the plaintiff, Clarence D. Rigsbee, was the owner of a 10-ton Kelly Springfield steam road roller, which was then at Camp Lee, near Peters-burg, Ya., and for a time theretofore had been in use by a contractor on Government work at that camp at a rental of $250 per month.
- 58 Ct. Cl. 98Austin Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff, the Austin Co., and the United States on or about the dates hereinafter mentioned entered into written contracts as follows: Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2713, December 13,1917, for 22 powder dry houses. Bureau of Yards and Docks, contract No. 2602, December 24, 1917, for two blending towers.
- 58 Ct. Cl. 143Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter’s statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff is a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Kansas, and owns and operates a system of railroad and railways extending from Chicago, Ill., on the east, to San Francisco and San Diego, Calif., on the west, over the main lines and branches of which system the plaintiff is now and was at the time hereinafter mentioned a common carrier…
- 58 Ct. Cl. 148Horton v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 158Sanford & Brooks Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 164Moser v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 167Lang Products Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 175Lang Products Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 180Rossia Insurance v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 182Illinois Central Railroad v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 189Horowitz v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 191Guilmette v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 193Guilmette v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 195Manning v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 199Myers v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 207Thomson v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 215Atlantic City Railroad v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 224Bush v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 232Austill v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 234A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 257C. E. Wilson Body Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 261Erie Coal & Coke Corp. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 269Byerly v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 274Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. The plaintiff is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. On October 20, 1917, Scanlon and his associates acquired an interest in the Carpenter-O’Brien Co. and on December 8, 1917, the name of the Carpenter-O’Brien Co. was changed to the Brooks-Scanlon Corporation.
- 58 Ct. Cl. 302Sisseton & Wahpeton Bands v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the court: I. This suit was filed on March 17, 1917, pursuant to a special jurisdictional act of Congress approved April 11, 1916, entitled “An act conferring jurisdiction on the Court of Claims to' hear, determine, and render judgment in claims of the Sisseton and Wahpeton Bands of Sioux Indians against the United States,” 39 Stat. 47, which act provides: “ That all claims of…
- 58 Ct. Cl. 336Cairo, Truman & Southern Railroad v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 339St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 341United States Bedding Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 343Supplee-Biddle Hardware Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 350Harwood v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 359Plunkett v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 371Merritt v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 373Morgan Engineering Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 380College Point Boat Corp. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 392Bates & Rogers Constr. Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 398Grymes v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 400Beery v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 401Ashby v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 403a. W. Duckett & Co., Inc. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 410Woerishoffer v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 428Southern Pacific Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 433Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 443Mitchell v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 450Nemours v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 466Healey v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 470Tayeoe v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 475Moore v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 479Witt v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 481Quinn v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 485Pearson v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 489Hummel v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 497Connell Steamboat Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 518Hart v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 541P. Lorillard Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The following are the facts of the case as found by the •court: I. Petitioner is a corporation created under the laws of the ¡State of New Jersey, is a citizen of the United States, a resident of New Jersey, has been and is engaged in the manufacture of cigarettes and other tobacco products for export •as well as for domestic consumption as set forth in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the petition filed in this case. II.
- 58 Ct. Cl. 559Gulf Refining Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 582Pierce-Arrow Motor Oar Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 583Atchison v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 593Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 603Boston Ins. Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 615New York v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 619St. Louis v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 622Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 633Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 639Hooton v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 642Alex. D. Shaw & Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 645Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The following are the fact of the case as found by the court: I. Plaintiff is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Oregon and as such corporation now is, and was during all the times hereinafter mentioned, engaged as a common carrier in the transportation of passengers and freight in and through various States of the United States, and, through connections with other railroad companies, between the points covered…
- 58 Ct. Cl. 651Cumming v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 652New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 658Marr v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 663Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 671The Midland Land & Improvement Co. v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 688Noce v. United States (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 701Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United States (1922)
- 58 Ct. Cl. 701United States v. Northeastern Construction Company (1923)
- 58 Ct. Cl. 703United States v. Bancroft (1922)U.S. Court of Federal Claims
- 58 Ct. Cl. 704Price Fire & Water Proofing Co. v. States (1923)
- 58 Ct. Cl. 705United States v. Moran (1923)
- 58 Ct. Cl. 710United States v. Mossel (1923)U.S. Court of Federal Claims