Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 F.1d 303 - Evans v. Charles Scribner's Sons

Evans v. Charles Scribner's Sons’s Empirical Analysis

58 F. 303 · 1893

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1949
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1949

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

20189319001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It appears that the policies are now in the state of New York, hut the indebtedness is by a corporation of the state of Wisconsin. As to these policies, the suit does not seek to enforce ‘any legal or equitable lien upon or claim to any property either real or personal’; neither does it seek ‘to remove any incumbrance, lien, or cloud upon the title to any real or personal property.’ Even if the insurance policies in issue could be said to be, in any fair sense, such personal property as is contemplated by the statute, the policies are in the state of New York, and not in this district.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"That they could be proceeded against in respect of the stock in question in the mode and for the limited purposes indicated in the eighth section of the act of Congress of March 3, 1875 ( 18 Stat. 470 , c. 137), which authorized proceedings by publication against absent defendants in any suit commenced in any Circuit Court of the United States to enforce any legal or equitable lien upon or claim to, or to remove any incumbrance or lien or cloud upon the title to real or personal property within the district where such suit is brought.” (Italics mine.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.