Greene v. Beidler’s Empirical Analysis
58 F.2d 207 · 1932
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2010
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morgan v. Daniels · Marsh v. Nichols, Shepard & Co. · Barrett Co. v. Koppers Co. · Beidler v. Caps · Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. Marsh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot come into a District Court and say, now for the first time we shall tell the true story of reduction to practice and demand a patent” and stating”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hyatt v. Doll
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.