Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 F.2d 377 - Byrd v. Ross

Byrd v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

58 F.2d 377 · 1932

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
July 1989
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1989

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

30193219401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Johnston · Steele v. Commissioner of Banks · Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. Duke · Brennan v. Tillinghast · State Ex Rel. Hanbury v. Tunnicliffe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[M]ere embarrassed circumstances, or even simple insolvency of a bank at the time of receiving a deposit, without more, does not warrant the rescission, for fraud, of the contract of deposit, if, when the deposit was accepted, there was a present genuine and reasonably founded hope, expectation, and intention on the part of the bank's officers to carry on the business.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.