Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

58 F.2d 416

Docket No. U-72-H.

Damm v. U-Save Corp.

California Southern District Court

Decided April 16, 1932.

California Southern District Court · decided 1932-04-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1932

1 district ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on City of Richmond v. Bird · Bignell v. Cummins · County of Glynn v. Brunswick Terminal Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-04-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*417John Perry Wood and Stanley Arndt, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for Harold W. Herlihy.

¶2Harold P. Huís, City Atty., and Leonard A. Diether, Deputy City Atty., both of Pasadena, Cal., for city of Pasadena.

¶3Mitchell, Silberberg & Davis, of Los Angeles, Cal., amici curias, for receiver.

¶4Everett W. Mattoon, Co. Counsel, . and Gordon Boiler, Deputy Co. Counsel, both of Los Angeles, Cal., amici curia;, for city of Pasadena.

¶5HOLLZER., District Judge. .

¶6It being conceded, at the hearing, that the defendant owned no property within the city of Pasadena at the time of the appointment of the receiver, and it being further admitted that the assets in the hands of the receiver are insufficient to pay the claims of unsecured creditors in full, the application of said city for an order directing the receiver to pay in full its claim for the tax levied upon personal property owned, but disposed of, by said defendant prior to the appointment of the receiver, is denied. An exception is allowed to- the claimant city of Pasadena. See City of Richmond v. Bird et al, 249 U. S. 174, 39 S. Ct. 186, 63 L. Ed. 543; Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bramwell (D. C.) 12 F.(2d) 307; Bignell v. Cummins, 69 Mont. 294, 222 P. 797, 36 A. L. R. 634; County of Glynn v. Brunswick Ter, Co., 101 Ga. 244, 28 S. E. 604; Edmonson v. Walker, 137 Tenn. 569; 195 S. W. 168; County Court of Calhoun County v. Matthews, 99 W. Ya. 483, 129 S. E. 399, 52 A. L. R. 751.

/58/f2d/416 · .json · Public domain