Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 F.2d 967 - Pardee Co. v. Austin

Pardee Co. v. Austin’s Empirical Analysis

58 F.2d 967 · 1932

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1976
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grand Trunk Ry Co of Canada v. Ives · Klein v. Young · Roman v. King · Home Realty Co. v. Carius · Lasyone v. Zenoria Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`No case has held where, as here, the landlord has furnished only one way to go, that the fact alone that occupants of the leased premises used that way, even though they knew it to be defective, would defeat recovery. On the contrary, the law is that in such case, the landlord having furnished that way to go, occupants of the premises may use it, exercising care for their safety, and that it is a question of fact whether such care was used. [Citing cases.]'" [Emphasis supplied]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.