Shanaghan v. Cahill’s Empirical Analysis
58 F.3d 106 · 1995
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 45 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 182 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Lashawn A. v. Barry (1996), New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc. (1996)
31 federal appellate · 45 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · Rosado v. Wyman · Snyder v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 182 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the claim raises a novel or complex issue of State law, (2) the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction, (3) the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, or (4) in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“trial courts enjoy wide latitude in determining whether or not to retain jurisdiction over state claims when federal claims have been extinguished.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“form part of the same case or controversy”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.