United States v. David’s Empirical Analysis
58 F.3d 113 · 1995
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Tweedy v. State (2004), McClanahan v. Commonwealth (2010)
4 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Wade v. United States · Kashif v. United States · Sisson v. Ruby · Kashif v. United States · United States v. Conner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not [specifically] address the effect [the] defendant’s absconding would have on the government's obligations under the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.