Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 F.3d 1342 - Page v. Commissioner

Page v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Parrish v. Commissioner (1999), Schladweiler v. Commissioner (2002)

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 107 · 26 U.S.C. § 1402 · 26 U.S.C. § 170 · 26 U.S.C. § 446 · 26 U.S.C. § 501 · 26 U.S.C. § 6673 · 28 U.S.C. § 1912

Relies on North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas · Nebraska v. Wyoming · Liberty Mortgage Co. v. Frey · Bradford v. Commissioner · BW Parkway Associates Partnership v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Arithmetic precision was originally and exclusively in * * * [Mr. Gleason's] hands, and he had a statutory duty to provide it . . . [H]aving defaulted in his duty, he cannot frustrate the Commissioner's reasonable attempts by compelling investigation and recomputation under every means of income determination.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “where the Commissioner makes the assessment without any foundation or supporting evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Where a taxpayer’s method of accounting does not accurately reflect income, the Commissioner may determine the taxpayer’s income under a method which does clearly reflect income .... [W]here the taxpayer files income tax returns which substantially understate income, an assessment of deficiency is necessarily an estimate. As long as the reconstruction method is reasonable and logical, [the taxpayer] may not complain of its inevitable inaccuracies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.