Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 F.3d 183 - Davis v. Parker

Davis v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

58 F.3d 183 · 1995

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

50199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 595 So. 2d 624 - Lima v. Schmidt · Sterling & Esther Jensen v. George M. Snellings, III & Snellings, Breard, Sartor, Inabnett & Trascher, Defendants-Third Party Granada Corp. v. Appalachian Insurance Co., Third Party · Starns v. Emmons · Cherokee Restaurant, Inc. v. Pierson · Cherokee Pump & Equipment Inc. v. Aurora Pump

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “predicated on traditional legal malpractice, but not more.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A. No action for damages against any attorney at law ..., whether based upon tort, or breach of contract, or otherwise, arising out of an engagement to provide legal services shall be brought unless filed in a court of competent jurisdiction and proper venue within one year from the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect is discovered or should have been discovered; however, even as to actions filed within one year from the date of such discovery, in all events such actions shall be filed at the latest within three years from the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “because the statute grants immunities or advantages to a special class in derogation of the general rights available to tort victims, it must be strictly construed against limiting the tort claimants' rights against the wrongdoer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.