Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

58 F. Supp. 424

Ruskin v. Coe

District of Columbia District Court

Decided January 10, 1945

District of Columbia District Court · decided 1945-01-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1951

1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1945-01-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BAILEY, Justice.

¶1The plaintiff is seeking a patent on a calcium salt of laevo-ascorbic acid for use as a therapeutical agent. This salt is old and using it as a medical preparation is not invention. However, the plaintiff is also claiming a patent on this salt mixed with an anti-oxidation stabilizing agent. By the use of this combination he has rendered this calcium salt, which was not before apparently of any use, a useful therapeutical agent. I think, therefore, he is entitled to a patent comprising his claims numbered 23 and 30, which are as follows:

“23. A medicinal preparation for injection into the animal organism for the treatment of calcium deficiency diseases and consisting essentially of a substantially pure calcium salt of laevo ascorbic acid mixed with an anti-oxidation stabilizing agent.
“30. The method of obtaining a medicinal preparation consisting essentially of substantially pure calcium laevo-ascorbate, which comprises reacting an aqueous solution of substantially pure laevo-ascorbic acid with calcium carbonate, whereby carbon dioxide remains dissolved in the solution of the calcium salt, and adding to the solution an anti-oxidation stabilizing agent.”

¶2The remaining claims are denied.

/58/fsupp/424 · .json · Public domain