¶1delivered the opinion of the Court:
¶2This was an action on the case, for an alleged injury to native cattle, by Texas cattle, in possession of appellant.
¶3The judgment was for appellee, in the circuit court.
¶4The validity of the act of February 27th, 1867, prohibiting the importation and possession of Texas and Cherokee cattle, is disputed. This has been decided by this court. Yeazel v. Alexander et al. ante, p. 254.
¶5The evidence sustains the judgment of the court below. Under the numerous rulings of this court, even if we had doubts as to the sufficiency of the proof, we should not disturb the finding.
¶6The judgment must be affirmed.
¶7Judgment affirmed.