Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 KAN 152 - In re Huron

In re Huron’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
July 1975
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1975

6 state decisions

40189719001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eastman v. State · Malone v. Murphy · Whitcomb's Case · Langenberg v. Decker · Ex Parte Mckee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Up to the time of the refusal of the witness, at least, the notary is only an executive officer, and is exercising executive power. There is no such thing as a punishable contempt of executive authority. While an executive ’officer might be constituted a court, judicial power cannot be conferred on him as merely ancillary to the exercise of purely executive power.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Not every one who hears testimony and exercises discretion and judgment in a matter submitted to him is necessarily a judicial officer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.