58 Md. App. 417 - Garrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2001
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Steele v. United States No. 1 · Washington v. Chrisman · Mitchell v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That all warrants, without oath or affirmation, to search suspected places, or to seize any person or property, are grevious [grievous] and oppressive; and all general warrants to search suspected places, or to apprehend suspected persons, without naming or describing the place, or the person in special, are illegal, and ought not to be granted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrison v. State““The infallibility of hindsight establishes that the police searched the right (McWebb’s) and the wrong (Garrison’s) premises." Garrison v. State, 58 Md.App. 417, 420 , 473 A.2d 514 (1984).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrison v. State“the premises known as 2036 Park Avenue third floor apartment”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maryland v. Garrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.