Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 MICH 49 - Fells v. Barbour

Fells v. Barbour’s Empirical Analysis

1885

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1941
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1941

3 state decisions

101885189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Bulte · Sibley v. Smith · Bird v. Perkins · Van Rensselaer v. Witbeck · Tweed v. Metcalf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It is conceded that there are a great many cases in which parties standing in particular relations to the land, or to the owner or other person interested therein, are not suffered to acquire tax titles and rely upon them as against other claimants. Some of those are very plain, and it is quite unnecessary to do more than name them. A tenant, for example, who has covenanted to pay the taxes, cannot be suffered to neglect this duty, and then acquire a tax title which shall cut off the title of his landlord. Neither shall the purchaser in possession under an executory contract be allowed to cut off the rights of his vendor by a like purchase, nor a mortgagor that of his mortgagee. A tax purchase made while such a_ relation exists is made in wrong; and the law in circumvention of dishonesty will conclusively presume that it was made in the performance of duty, and not in repudiation of it.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.