Beadle v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis
1920
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 1990
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stephens v. Conley · Martin v. Corscadden · Greene v. Montana Brewing Co. · Grorud v. Lossl · Collier v. Fitzpatrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the first question was intended ... to elicit the answer that the complaining witness made a full and fair disclosure of the facts, without stating what facts he disclosed, the objection was well taken, for a complaining witness is not permitted to testify that he related all of the facts and circumstances, without stating what they were.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hill v. Burlingame
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.