Hofler v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 38 N.C. App. 90 - In Re the Foreclosure of a Certain Deed of Trust From Watts · Liles v. . Rogers · American National Fire Insurance Company v. Gibbs · Bunker v. . Llewellyn · Commissioners of McDowell County v. Nichols
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The respondents argue that the record shows and the court found that Allentown and the respondents were co-sureties and for this reason Allentown has no right of subrogation but is limited to contribution. We do not believe the fact that Allentown and the respondents may have been sureties for the payment of the note is determinative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hofler v. Hill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.