58 N.C. App. 587 - State v. Hammette’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2017
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fuhrman v. United States Steel Corp. · United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr. · State v. Lynch · Abdul v. United States · Florists' Nationwide Telephone Delivery Network-America's Phone-Order Florists, Inc. v. Florists' Telegraph Delivery Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general rule is that the fact that a recording may not reproduce an entire conversation or may be indistinct or inaudible in part does not render it inadmissible unless the defects are so substantial as to leave the recording without probative value or to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1) that the recorded testimony was legally obtained and otherwise competent; 2) that the mechanical device was capable of recording testimony and that it was operating properly at the time the statement was recorded; 3) that the operator was competent and operated the machine properly; 4) the identity of the recorded voices; 5) the accuracy and authenticity of the recording; 6) that defendant's entire statement was recorded and no changes, additions, or deletions have since been made; and 7) the custody and manner in which the recording has been preserved since it was made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.