Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 NEB 87 - Clark v. Mossman

Clark v. Mossman’s Empirical Analysis

1899

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1923
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Huyck v. . Andrews · Kutz v. McCune · Omaha Southern Railway Co. v. Beeson · Blakely v. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Shepherd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The existence of a public highway cannot be ignored by a purchaser of the land with which the title of the strip must pass subject to the easement indicated. In purchasing the four-acre tract, plaintiff must be presumed to have taken notice- of the public highway. Both parties, it is to be assumed, contracted with reference to its existence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.