Taylor v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1951
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Walser · State v. Ceja · Peri v. Jeffers · Martin v. Della · Taylor v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Counsel for respondent, in the last-mentioned motion, sets forth grounds not contained in their first motion, notwithstanding the order of the court, in giving permission to again move, limited the grounds of such new motion. Notwithstanding this fact, it is sought to have the bill of exceptions stricken and the appeal dismissed for a defect which existed when the first motion was made. “We do not deem it necesary to dispose of the contention of appellant that respondent waived the grounds of the motion not contained in the first motion, though we are inclined to the view that the contention as to waiver is good.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.