¶1 The ruling was in accordance with the practice approved in Haines v. R. F. Ins. Co., 52 N. H. 467, and is not subject to exception.
¶2 Exception overruled.
58 N.H. 151
State v. Cone
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 5, 1877
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1877-08-05
Indictment, for murder. The defendant excepted to the ruling that a witness called by the state, whose testimony, given at the magistrate’s examination, had been written by the magistrate and signed by the witness, should not be asked, on cross-examination, by counsel having the written testimony, what that testimony was.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1905
1 state decisions
Relies on Haines v. Republic Fire Ins.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1877-08-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →