Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

58 N.H. 183

Chase & Co. v. Bean

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 5, 1877

Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1877-08-05

Assumpsit, by C. H. Chase and S. H. Chase, partners, for goods sold. After the sale of the plaintiffs’ goods to the defendant, C. II. Chase and the defendant agreed that f 150 of the price should be paid by the defendant’s allowing that sum in payment of a debt of that amount due to him from C. H. Chase : and that agreement was executed, the defendant acting in good faith.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1889

4 state decisions

Relies on Greeley v. Wyeth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1877-08-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Doe, C. J.

¶1 An action at law cannot be maintained by copartners to recover a debt which has been discharged by one of them, and paid by a set-off of his separate debt with his assent, when the defendant *184 acted in good faith. Homer v. Wood, 11 Cush. 62; Williams v. Brimhall, 13 Gray 462; Tay v. Ladd, 15 Gray 296; Greeley v. Wyeth, 10 N. H. 15.

¶2 Case discharged.

Bingham, J., did not sit.
/58/nh/183 · .json · Public domain