¶1 If the alteration is a defect, it is one of form only. Reynolds \. Eamrell, 19 N. H. 394 ; Berry v. Osborn, 28 N. H. 279.
¶2 Motion denied.
58 N.H. 28
Holt v. Downs
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 5, 1876
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · decided 1876-12-05
Motion, to quash a writ signed and issued by the clerk of Merrimack, and made returnable and entered in Hillsborough. The ground of the motion was, that when the blank was filled, “ Merrimack” in the margin was erased, and “ Hillsborough” inserted.
Relies on Berry v. Osborn · Reynolds v. Damrell
Decided 1876-12-05