Laumbach v. Laumbach’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1982 · most notably Luna v. Flores (1958), Industrial Supply Company v. Goen (1954)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(2) The findings of fact shall consist only of such ultimate facts as are necessary to determine the issues in the case, as distinguished from evidentiary facts supporting them. * * * ” (Emphasis added.)”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage““We have held in an unbroken line of decisions that it is the duty of the court to make findings of fact. In this case the court was requested by both parties to make a finding of fact on a material issue, and on conflicting testimony, and failure to do so constitutes error.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Price v. Price““We consider this a mandatory provision. ’ Obviously the rule means, that where, as here, request is seasonably made, it is the duty of the trial court to find all of the ultimate facts. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Curbello v. Vaughn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.