Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 N.M. 446 - State v. Heisler

State v. Heisler’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 237 So. 2d 134 - Sanford v. Rubin (1970), State v. Lopez (1999)

82 state decisions

2201954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Garcia · State v. Garcia · State v. Compton · State v. Diamond · State v. Armijo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here self-defense is involved in a criminal case and there is any evidence, although slight, to establish [such defense], it is not only proper for the court, but its duty as well, to instruct the jury fully and clearly on all phases of the law on [that] issue....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * This court, of course, will exercise this discretion very guardedly, and only where some fundamental right has been invaded, and never in aid of strictly legal, technical, or unsubstantial claims, nor will we consider the weight of evidence if any substantial evidence was submitted to support the verdict. If substantial justice has been done, parties must have duly taken and preserved exceptions in the lower court to the invasion of their legal right before we will notice them here. * * * ” (Emphasis added).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is the law in most jurisdictions that if there is evidence appearing in the record which would raise a reasonable doubt as to whether the homicide with which the defendant is charged was committed in self-defense, it is the duty of the trial court to instruct upon that issue * * * and a failure to so instruct is error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.