Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 N.M. 479 - Marr v. Nagel

Marr v. Nagel’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 1984
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1984

16 state decisions

601954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““9. If you find any or all of the defendants negligent in the collision involving the Marr car and the Nagel truck, and that such negligence on the part of each Defendant was either the proximate cause or a contributing proximate cause to the collision between the Nagel and Marr vehicles, specify the damages proximately suffered by each of the following parties: “Robert M. Marr: $10,000.00 “Opal Russell: $ 2,000.00 “J. V. Russell: $ None””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “certainly became an aggrieved party at least to the extent that the trial court in discharging the co-defendant and joint tortfeasor ... thereby deprived him, Nagel, of a possible right of contribution from the co-defendant Cohn.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.