Heath v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2002
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 19 Cal. 2d 605 - Neet v. Holmes · State Ex Rel. Truitt v. District Court of Ninth Judicial Dist. · 12 Cal. 2d 573 - Turlock Theatre Co. v. Laws · Peisker v. Chavez · Cleveland v. Bateman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Fourth. When lands or any interest in lands are the object of any suit in whole or in part, such suit shall be brought in the county where-the land or any portion thereof is situate.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is true that the first point raised by appellant bases its jurisdictional attack on a slightly different basis from that upon which we dispose of the case. However, lack of jurisdiction in the trial court is a question which this Court is required to consider, even in the absence of its being raised by the parties. [Citations omitted.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Worland v. Worland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.