Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 OHIOST2D 478 - State v. Robinson

State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

89 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably State v. Chatton (1984), State v. Leak (Slip Opinion) (2016)

89 state decisions

380197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · South Dakota v. Opperman · Cady v. Dombrowski · Cooper v. State of California · Cass v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the evidence does not demonstrate that the procedure involved is merely a pretext for an evidentiary search of the impounded vehicle.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “has consistently sustained police intrusions into automobiles impounded or otherwise in lawful police custody where the process is aimed at securing or protecting the car and its contents.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “To satisfy the requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, an inventory search of a lawfully impounded vehicle must be conducted in good faith and in accordance with reasonable standardized procedure(s) or established routine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.