Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 OR 73 - Trullinger v. Howe

Trullinger v. Howe’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
November 1979
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 1979

18 state decisions

601911192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Downing · State v. Sieber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Before a party can be brought into contempt for not complying with an order or decree of court, service thereof must be made upon him, and a demand duly made that he comply therewith, unless it appear that he has personal knowledge or notice of such order or decree, and this must be shown by the affidavit upon which the proceedings are based: State ex rel. v. Downing, 40 Or. 314, 325 ( 58 Pac. 863 : 66 Pac. 917 ), and cases there cited. “The affidavit herein is defective, in that it makes no mention of either such service or knowledge of notice: State ex rel. v. Downing, 40 Or. 314, 325 ( 58 Pac. 863 : 66 Pac. 917 ). * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.