Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 P3D 1049 - Leiting v. Mutha

Leiting v. Mutha’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2020

14 state decisions

90200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey · United States v. De Peri · People v. Gaffney · Parsons v. Honeywell, Inc. · United States v. Mackey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless the court determines that their probative value in assisting the jury to evaluate the expert's opinion substantially outweighs their prejudicial effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “objected on the grounds that each document contained inadmissible hearsay”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.