Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 SD 603 - Parrott v. Abernathy

Parrott v. Abernathy’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
August 1943
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. Board of County Com'rs of Love County Okl · Browning v. City of Waycross · Marsh v. Fulton County · Louisiana v. Wood · Stutsman County Dak v. Wallace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It should be kept in mind that the rules which apply to actions to recover back money paid by one person to another do not apply, to their full extent, to actions to recover back from a county, town, or other municipality money in payment of taxes illegally or irregularly assessed or levied. There are certain considerations of public policy which must necessarily be taken into consideration. If a party could recover back from the public whenever there was some illegal or irregular action on the part of public officers in the assessment or levy of the tax, merely because he was ignorant of such illegality or irregularity at the time he paid the tax, the public finances would be thrown into chaos, and frequently municipalities would be reduced to utter bankruptcy’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.