Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 58 So. 2d 523 - Faulk v. Parrish

58 So. 2d 523 - Faulk v. Parrish’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 1970
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 1970

3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

70195219601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on J. G. Christopher Co. v. Russell · G. Ferlita & Sons, Inc. v. Beck · Walker, Et Vir. v. Smith, Eat Al. · Groover v. Hammond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a declaration or complaint shows on its face that the negligence of the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of the injuries, no cause of action is stated and a demurrer should be sustained, or a motion to dismiss granted as the case may be. “There has been some confusion with reference to contributory negligence and in order to eliminate such confusion, or doubts, which may have existed as to contributory negligence, we hold: “(1) Where the positive allegations of a complaint, or declaration, show that the plaintiff has been guilty of negligence and that such negligence contributed proximately to the injuries, such declaration fails to state a cause of action and may be taken advantage of by the defendant. Contributory negligence is a complete bar to recovery.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.