King v. Riedl’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc. · 611 So. 2d 313 - Continental Eagle Corp. v. Mokrzycki · Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. Fields · 886 So. 2d 807 - AMER. GEN. LIFE AND ACC. INS. v. Underwood · 883 So. 2d 1221 - Scott Bridge Co. v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Related claims based on causes of action other than contract, including negligence, also cannot be pursued if they arise out of the performance of the illegal contract.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.